Products related to Impartial:
-
Applied Ethics : An Impartial Introduction
Applied Ethics: An Impartial Introduction prepares readers to evaluate selected classical and contemporary problems in applied ethics in a way that does justice to their complexity without sacrificing clarity or fairness of representation.Its balanced exposition and analysis, enhanced by helpful pedagogical features, make it an ideal book for introducing the ethics of real-life problems including abortion, animal rights, disability, the environment, poverty, and punishment.
Price: 24.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
An Objective Impartial Criticism of the Life of Man or Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson
Price: 25.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
An Utterly Impartial History of Britain : (or 2000 Years Of Upper Class Idiots In Charge)
Many of us were put off history by the dry and dreary way it was taught at school.Back then 'The Origins of the Industrial Revolution' somehow seemed less compelling than the chance to test the bold claim on Timothy Johnson's 'Shatterproof' ruler.But here at last is a chance to have a good laugh and learn all that stuff you feel you really ought to know by now... In this 'Horrible History for Grown Ups' you can read how Anglo-Saxon liberals struggled to be positive about immigration; 'Look I think we have to try and respect the religious customs of our new Viking friends - oi, he's nicked my bloody ox!'Discover how England's peculiar class system was established by some snobby French nobles whose posh descendents still have wine cellars and second homes in the Dordogne today. And explore the complex socio-economic reasons why Britain's kings were the first in Europe to be brought to heel; (because the Stuarts were such a useless bunch of untalented, incompetent, arrogant, upper-class thickoes that Parliament didn't have much choice.)A book about then that is also incisive and illuminating about now, '2000 Years of Upper Class Idiots in Charge', is an hilarious, informative and cantankerous journey through Britain' fascinating and bizarre history.As entertaining as a witch burning, and a lot more laughs.
Price: 10.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Justice and Efficiency in Mega-Litigation
Justice and Efficiency in Mega-Litigation explores the phenomenon of extremely long-running, resource-intensive civil litigation known as ‘mega-litigation’.Such litigation challenges the courts to reconcile the objectives of justice and efficiency – for the parties to the case and for the community.Drawing on interviews with judges of the courts of England and Wales, and of Australia, this book shows how judges have responded to these challenges. It situates mega-litigation within broader developments in civil procedure and case management, as well as theoretical debates about the role of courts and the purpose of civil procedure.The book highlights the importance of intensive, creative and flexible case management; focus on the issues in dispute; and, ultimately, each judge’s expert intuition.
Price: 34.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
What exactly does impartial mean?
Impartial means to be fair and unbiased, without favoring one side over another. It involves making decisions or judgments based on objective criteria rather than personal feelings or preferences. An impartial person is able to consider all perspectives and evidence before coming to a conclusion, and does not let their own biases influence their actions or decisions.
-
What is the neutral and impartial summer interview with Alice Weidel in 2022?
The neutral and impartial summer interview with Alice Weidel in 2022 is a conversation with the German politician that aims to provide a balanced and unbiased perspective on her views and policies. The interview seeks to present Weidel's positions on various issues without bias or favoritism, allowing viewers to form their own opinions based on the information presented. The interviewer aims to ask probing and fair questions, giving Weidel the opportunity to express her views openly and honestly. This type of interview is important for providing the public with a clear and unbiased understanding of Weidel's political stances.
-
What does the International Court of Justice do?
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It settles legal disputes between states and gives advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by the UN General Assembly, Security Council, or other specialized agencies. The ICJ also interprets and applies international law, helping to promote peaceful resolution of international conflicts and uphold the rule of law in the international community.
-
What is the legitimacy of the European Court of Justice?
The legitimacy of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is derived from its role as the highest court in the European Union, responsible for interpreting EU law and ensuring its consistent application across member states. The ECJ's legitimacy is also rooted in its independence and impartiality, as well as its adherence to the principles of the rule of law and the protection of fundamental rights. Furthermore, the ECJ's decisions are binding on all EU member states, which enhances its legitimacy as a central institution in the EU's legal framework. Overall, the ECJ's legitimacy is based on its essential function in upholding the legal order of the EU and ensuring the uniform application of EU law.
Similar search terms for Impartial:
-
Climate Litigation and Justice in Africa
EPDF and EPUB available Open Access under CC-BY-NC-ND licence. In recent years, climate litigation has become an important subject of global scholarly and policy interest.However, developments within the Global South, particularly in Africa, have been largely neglected.This volume brings together an international team of contributors to provide a much-needed examination of climate litigation in Africa.The book outlines how climate litigation in Africa is distinct as well as pinpointing where it connects with the global conversation.Chapters engage with crucial themes such as human rights approaches to climate governance, corporate liability and the role of gender in climate litigation.Spanning a range of approaches and jurisdictions, the book challenges universal concepts around climate and the role of activism (including litigation) in seeking to advance climate governance.
Price: 100.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Strategies of Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights : Rational Choice Within Normative Constraints
In Strategies of Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights, Andreas von Staden looks at the nature of human rights challenges in two enduring liberal democracies—Germany and the United Kingdom.Employing an ambitious data set that covers the compliance status of all European Court of Human Rights judgments rendered until 2015, von Staden presents a cross-national overview of compliance that illustrates a strong correlation between the quality of a country's democracy and the rate at which judgments have met compliance.Tracing the impact of violations in Germany and the United Kingdom specifically, he details how governments, legislators, and domestic judges responded to the court's demands for either financial compensation or changes to laws, policies, and practices. Framing his analysis in the context of the long-standing international relations debate between rationalists who argue that actions are dictated by an actor's preferences and cost-benefit calculations, and constructivists, who emphasize the influence of norms on behavior, von Staden argues that the question of whether to comply with a judgment needs to be analyzed separately from the question of how to comply.According to von Staden, constructivist reasoning best explains why Germany and the United Kingdom are motivated to comply with the European Court of Human Rights judgments, while rationalist reasoning in most cases accounts for how these countries bring their laws, policies, and practices into sufficient compliance for their cases to be closed.When complying with adverse decisions while also exploiting all available options to minimize their domestic impact, liberal democracies are thus both norm-abiding and rational-instrumentalist at the same time—in other words, they choose their compliance strategies rationally within the normative constraint of having to comply with the Court's judgments.
Price: 85.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Strategic Human Rights Litigation : Understanding and Maximising Impact
Strategic human rights litigation (SHRL) is a growing area of international practice yet one that remains relatively under-explored.Around the globe, advocates increasingly resort to national, regional and international courts and bodies ‘strategically’ to protect and advance human rights.This book provides a framework for understanding SHRL and its contribution to various forms of personal, legal, social, political and cultural change, as well as the many tensions and challenges it gives rise to.It suggests a reframing of how we view the impact of SHRL in its multiple dimensions, both positive and negative.Five detailed case studies, drawn predominantly from the author’s own experience, explore litigation in a broad range of contexts (genocide in Guatemala; slavery in Niger; forced disappearance in Argentina; torture and detention in the ‘war on terror’; and Palestinian land rights) to reveal the complexity of the role of SHRL in the real world.Ultimately, this book considers how impact analysis might influence the development of more effective litigation strategies in the future.
Price: 35.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Tort Liability in Warfare : States' Wrongs and Civilians' Rights
In the turbulent arena of armed conflicts, Tort Liability in Warfare: States' Wrongs and Civilians' Rights emerges as a groundbreaking exploration of civilians' legal recourse against states for losses to life, bodily integrity, and property. With a fresh perspective informed by corrective justice, the law of war, and substantive rule of law principles, Haim Abraham constructs a novel framework for understanding the moral and legal obligation of states to civilians in the aftermath of combat, and proposes that existing domestic tort law could and should address wrongful losses in this context.This book boldly confronts the prevailing academic and legal orthodoxy which dismisses the application of tort law in times of war, and offers a framework that empowers individuals to vindicate their rights and acts as a bulwark against abuse of public power. By reviewing and analyzing the applicability of tort law to peacekeeping, urban warfare, counter-terrorism activities, and long-range warfare in Australia, Canada, England, Israel, and the United States, the book offers real world insights on how tort liability can serve as a mechanism for reparations and accountability. Tort Liability in Warfare is a clarion call for a shift in legal paradigms, urging a path towards effective remedies for civilians caught in the crossfire of nations at war.It is an essential read for legal scholars, practitioners, and anyone invested in the pursuit of justice in the complex landscape of armed conflict.This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence.
Price: 100.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
What is the difference between social jurisdiction and labor jurisdiction?
Social jurisdiction refers to the legal framework that governs social security benefits, such as healthcare, pensions, and unemployment insurance. On the other hand, labor jurisdiction deals with the regulation of labor relations, including issues related to employment contracts, working conditions, and labor disputes. While social jurisdiction focuses on providing social protections to individuals, labor jurisdiction is more concerned with regulating the relationship between employers and employees in the workplace.
-
What is mandatory jurisdiction?
Mandatory jurisdiction refers to a situation where a court is required to hear a case that falls within its jurisdiction. This means that the court does not have the discretion to refuse to hear the case if it meets certain criteria. In contrast, discretionary jurisdiction allows a court to choose whether or not to hear a case. Mandatory jurisdiction is typically found in cases involving certain types of legal issues or parties, such as cases involving constitutional questions or cases between states.
-
Which jurisdiction is competent?
The jurisdiction that is competent is typically determined by the specific laws and regulations governing the issue at hand. In general, jurisdiction is determined based on factors such as the location of the parties involved, the location where the issue arose, and the type of legal matter being addressed. It is important to consult with a legal professional to determine the appropriate jurisdiction for a specific case or legal matter.
-
What is the salary of a Supreme Court justice in the USA?
The salary of a Supreme Court justice in the USA is $255,300 per year as of 2021. This salary is set by the United States Congress and is the same for all Supreme Court justices, regardless of their seniority or experience. In addition to their salary, Supreme Court justices also receive benefits such as health insurance, retirement benefits, and allowances for expenses related to their official duties.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.